Overall rating 
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
290 out of 307(94%)reviewers recommend this product.
Product Reviews
Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Granny61
fromDeming, New Mexico
I would repeat the purchase.
PostedJune 21, 2012
ProsComfortable, Durable, Great with Jeans, Versatile, Warmth
ConsPoor Cushioning, Too Stiff
Purchased these as a replacement for my IN door/outdoor house shoes. I don't go barefoot because of arthiritis in my feet. I wish it had a little more cushioning in the foot bed. However I enjoy the fit and warmth. Wear them every evening after work.
Written by a customer while visiting skechers.com
Overall rating 
5 / 5
5 / 5
Germandiva
fromOttawa, Ohio
Love my Sketchers
PostedOctober 8, 2011
ProsComfortable, Cushions Impact, Stylish
Love the style, will wear them outside when going on walks. Good with jeans.
Written by a customer while visiting skechers.com
Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Gotta Be Comfy
fromSyracuse, NY
Comfy winter Clog
PostedDecember 30, 2010
ProsComfortable, Durable, Great with Jeans, Stylish, Versatile
Cute, Stylish and fun just what I look for in a shoe. Perfect choice if you don't wanna wear boots, but want the warmth and traction.
Written by a customer while visiting skechers.com
Overall rating 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Clare - addicted to work!
fromsouthern Illinois
Heavy, but comfortable
PostedNovember 17, 2010
ProsArch Support, Comfortable, Cushions Impact, Durable, Great with Jeans, Stable, Stylish, Versatile
This is a clunky fun shoe. It is a bit heavy, but your calves will look great after wearing these furry warm clogs. I wear them to work where I am literally standing and moving all day long. They do have a tendency to come off if I am wearing socks with them and walking faster than I should in them. These are not shoes for exercise, so use them appropriately and they will love you back!
Written by a customer while visiting skechers.com
  • 2024-05-10 T21:43:22.161-05:00
  • bvseo_pps, prod_bvrr, vn_prr_5.6
  • cp-43, bvpage2n
  • co_hasreviews, tv_321, tr_321
  • loc_en_US, sid_33385, prod, sort_default
169-172 of 321